Education Policy Institute

4401-A Connecticut Avenue, Box 294, Washington, DC 20008
Tel: (202) 244-7535, Fax: (202) 244-7584
Education Exchange
Volume 2, Issue 8 -- August 1998

Focusing on Education Reforms at Your School, in Your State Legislature, and in Congress

In This Issue

Education at a Crossroads: What Works and What's Wasted
in Education Today

1998 Biennial AFT Convention Highlights

Baltimore School System Gets Serious About Job Performance

Is NEA Joining Forces with GOP?

EPI's Education Quick Facts

Education at a Crossroads: What Works
and What's Wasted in Education Today

After traveling to 15 states, hearing testimony from more than 225 witnesses, and assessing dozens of reports, the Education and the Workforce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations released its findings about the state of education in America. Chairman Pete Hoekstra (R-MI) reported that among a few "shining examples of educational excellence," the major findings are dismal.

There has been no improvement in American education since A Nation at Risk was released in 1983; 40 percent of fourth-graders do not read at even a basic level; half of the students from urban school districts fail to graduate on time, if at all; average 1996 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) scores among 17 year olds are lower than they were in 1984; American students fall farther behind students from other countries the longer they are in school.

Federal programs have done nothing to improve children's education; public institutions of higher education annually spend $1 billion on remedial education; in 1995, private-sector and federal employers spent a combined $55.3 billion to provide training in basic academic skills.

The federal role in local education has steadily increased over the last 40 years. As a result of the study, the General Accounting Office identified 788 education programs, administered by 40 agencies, departments, boards, and commissions. Of those, 307 (38%) flow through the U.S. Department of Education, with $59 billion in funding, administered by more than 18,000 federal and state education employees. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services sponsors the next highest number of education programs (172, $8.6 billion), followed by 33 education programs at the U.S. Department of Agriculture at over $13 billion.

Significantly, the GAO also determined that the key shared components of successful schools were found to include the following:

  • A well-defined mission focused on academics;
  • An environment that encourages parental involvement and collaboration with staff;
  • School autonomy;
  • Rigorous and well-focused curricula; and
  • Effective and engaging instruction.

In November 1997, the GAO reported that "no central source of information exists about all the programs providing services to the same target groups among different agencies or about those providing a similar service to several target groups...[w]e do not know what is working and what is not in today's programs."

Some studies show popular, but expensive programs are not effective. A recent official evaluation of the Title I (formerly Chapter I) program determined that the initial gap in test scores between the more disadvantaged students participating in the federal program and non-participants did not narrow as a result of program participation.

Other studies prove "what works," but are largely disregarded. Project Follow-Through revealed that the Direct Instruction method had the greatest positive impact on basic reading and computation. Furthermore, methods of instruction that stressed "learning to learn" or "self esteem" showed either negative or no effect on the group surveyed. Project Follow-Through, a billion dollar, federally funded study which began in 1976 and continued through 1995, involved more than 70,000 children in more than 180 schools.

So what's to be done? The Education at a Crossroads Report concludes with four recommendations:

  1. Congress should consolidate elementary and secondary education programs into flexible grants, to support effective state and local initiatives, ensuring that it neither impedes local innovation and control, nor diverts dollars from the classroom through burdensome regulations and overhead.
  2. Empower parents by reducing family tax burdens, encouraging school choice programs; Congress could even give states the option to use their Title 1 program funds to provide direct grants to disadvantaged students whose parents could use these grants for private school tuition or outside tutoring assistance at learning centers.
  3. Emphasize basic academics rather than social experimentation.
  4. The federal government should only play a limited role in education, serving as a research and statistics-gathering agency, disseminating findings and enabling states to share best practices with each other.

Extensive documentation, including the name, title and organization of hearing witnesses, superintendent survey, charts and graphs are included in the report. As a result, Education at a Crossroads is likely to become a guidebook to members of Congress as the reauthorization for the Elementary and Secondary Education Act comes up in 1999.

To receive a copy of this report, contact the House Education and the Workforce Committee at 202/225-7101.

The PTA and Education Establishment React

From the National PTA: The PTA opposes the Education at a Crossroads solutions. Instead, "The PTA believes that the federal role in public education must be strengthened to sustain a strong democratic society. National PTA believes that improving schools requires more parent involvement, increased investment of public funds for public education, and strategies to reduce class size, construct adequate facilities, furnish access to technology, and provide school-based before- and after-school care."

From the Committee for Education Funding: Joel Packer, vice-president of the committee, and a senior lobbyist with the NEA, challenged the findings of the Education at a Crossroads report by suggesting that it is based on a series of false premises.

1998 Biennial AFT Convention Highlights

3,327 delegates represented 541 AFT locals from 26 state federations
in New Orleans from Thursday, July 16 through Monday, July 20

As submitted by the executive council, delegates amended the AFT constitution to include an elected executive vice president, and reduce the vice presidents (by one) to thirty seven, creating a 40-member executive council, elected by convention delegates for two-year terms.

Sandra Feldman was elected to her first full term as president, but received fewer votes than Edward J. McElroy who was reelected secretary-treasurer. Nat LaCour, president of United Teachers of New Orleans, was elected executive vice-president. All candidates, including the 37 candidates for vice-president posts ran unopposed. Of the vice presidents, 18 are also delegates to the AFL-CIO.

AFT delegates overwhelmingly approved -- 1,982 to 46 -- the Principles of Unity which NEA delegates defeated last month by secret ballot in an open vote . AFT President Feldman pledged to "do everything I can" to carry the idea of an AFT/NEA united organization forward.

AFT's 1997-1998 program budget revenues from per-capita dues, investment income, subscriptions, advertising and other items is budgeted at just over $88 million.

With $1.2 million in expenses over income in FY 1997, expanded political action programs, and the AFT president's monthly radio advertisements boosted to $3 million, the executive council asked the delegates to approve a dues increase -- which they did. Per capita dues will go up 35 cents per member starting next month (from $9.50 per month to $9.85 per month). In September 1999, dues will jump to $10.25 per member, per month.

Five cents of the per capita monthly dues will be allocated to fund the newly formed Albert Shanker Institute, "dedicated to finding new ways to promote democracy, quality education and the role of unions in a democratic society." A 12-member board from labor, business, academia, and politics will target selected issues. Shanker, AFT president for 23 years, died in 1997.

Convention guest speakers included President Bill Clinton, Secretary of Labor Alexis Herman, Congressman William Jefferson (D-LA), AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, and AFL-CIO Executive Vice President Linda Chavez-Thompson.

The defeat of Proposition 226 in California gave rise to a special order of business encouraging AFT locals to "build ongoing political action at the grassroots level and create a membership that is energized and educated about issues." AFT leaders reported that legislation or initiatives similar to Prop 226 -- the Paycheck Protection initiative -- are now pending in more than 30 states, and that "the groups supporting these efforts have almost unlimited financial resources."

Convention delegates adopted 40 resolutions, referred 5 resolutions to the executive committee, and defeated a proposed resolution which would have urged the United States government to end the embargo against Cuba.

Resolutions passed covered such disparate issues as helping "substitute teachers to achieve collective bargaining rights," efforts "to secure legislation mandating that reproductive/contraceptive services be covered in all insurance plans," "redesigning low-performing schools," "reducing military spending," and "passage of the Equal Rights Amendments in all unratified states, especially Illinois."

AFT claims to be "one of the fastest-growing labor unions in the country" with membership growth in each of its five divisions: K-12 teachers, paraprofessionals and school-related personnel, state and local employees, nurses and health professionals, and higher education faculty and staff. As of June 1, 1998, AFT reported membership of nearly 985,000.

In the future, expect AFT to:

  • Target for membership the 1.5 million unorganized school support staff;
  • Step up the fight against "enemies of public education";
  • Include in contract negotiations the opportunity and funding to pursue certification by the National Board for Professional Teachers Standards (NBPTS), and strong, fair peer assistance and review programs;
  • Increase the opportunities for school-related personnel to become classroom teachers;
  • Seek legislation to protect health care "whistle-blowers" and demonstrate against understaffing at hospitals;
  • Continue its opposition to efforts to privatize government services;
  • Release its computer software program to "identify the real costs of contracting out a public service."

Baltimore School System Gets Serious About Job Performance

Baltimore Public School Chief Robert Booker is serious about improving staff qualifications at all levels of the school system he oversees. Continuing on the course his predecessor, Robert Schiller, had begun, Booker has taken action to deny pay increases and downgrade certification status of 103 teachers and low-level managers who received poor job evaluations.

According to Howard P. Rawlings, a Baltimore Democrat, "It is a sign that the old ways of doing business are not going to be tolerated and that teachers, principals and administrators who are not doing their job will be packed up and shipped out."

Though the Baltimore Teachers Union has reacted with anger and threats, Booker says school system lawyers have assured him the action is legal under the contract.

In addition to the teaching jobs that are at stake, nearly one fourth of the system's 180 principals have been placed on improvement plans, and other administrators in the district are also coming under scrutiny.

Booker says that if one looks at the big picture, this is "a step in the direction of assuring accountability." Poor job evaluations in the past seldom led to any consequences, particularly any that were designed to improve the system of education for the students.

In a recent report in The Sun, Baltimore's local newspaper, several principals testified that "having a bad teacher transferred was preferable to going through a process that would often lead to an ugly battle with the union."

The newspaper noted that a new teacher evaluation process linking job performance to children's test scores is set to take effect next year.

Is NEA Joining Forces with GOP?

Leaders of the National Education Association are seeking ways to present a bipartisan image to their membership and other onlookers. This is a challenging task, for they have consistently sent more than 95% of NEA-PAC donations to Democrats, and provided one out of every nine delegates to recent Democratic National Conventions, without a corresponding representation at Republican conventions.

Now, with Republicans controlling Congress, the NEA national leadership is finding itself at odds with many of its local affiliates in the process of endorsing candidates for the 1998 midterm elections.

So far this year, ten of the NEA-PAC's 246 endorsed Congressional candidates are Republicans. The union hopes to endorse a total of 20 Republicans this election year. In 1996, they backed just one.

EPI's Education Quick Facts

  • Education was the primary occupation of about 75 million people in the United States in the fall of 1997. Included in this total were about 66.3 million students enrolled in American schools and colleges, and about 4 million people employed as elementary and secondary school teachers and college faculty. This total equals more than 1 out of every 4 persons in the United States. (Source: Mini-Digest of Education Statistics 1997)
  • Quoting George Will in a speech at a Pacific Research Institute Privatization Awards Dinner: " We are today graduating from our schools the first generation in American history less well educated than the generation that came before." The reasons: the shortest school year in the industrialized world -- 180 days compared to 220 in Europe and Japan and 240 in Korea -- and the replacement of the traditional three Rs with "racism, reproduction, and recycling." (Source: Pacific Research Institute newsletter, Summer 1998)
  • The content of a John Engler for Governor (R-MI) print ad begins, "Welcome to our restaurant. We don't have menus here. The government has chosen what you'll eat. I'll bring it right out." It opens to disclose a man holding out keys for a government-selected car, and then states, "Welcome to the first day of school. The government has decided where your child will go to school. You have no choice in the matter. Sorry if the school is dirty and crime-ridden. But this is your child's school. It's too important to trust the choice to you." (Source: Detroit Free Press, August 12, 1998)
  • Since 1965, the federal Head Start program has served more than 15 million children at a total cost of over $30 billion. Yet, according to the U.S. General Accounting Office, the early childhood development program operates without any valid, useful study of how well it works. (Source: PolicyWire.com, July 20, 1998)

See File

Copyright 1998
Education Policy Institute, PMB 294, 4401-A Connecticut Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20008-2322 202/244-7535, Fax 202/244-7584 http://www.educationpolicy.org